Towards a Unified Belief Structure in Games with indeterminate probabilities
نویسنده
چکیده
This paper provides an analysis of different formal representations of beliefs in epistemic game theory. The aim is to attempt a synthesis of different structures of beliefs in the presence of indeterminate probabilities. Special attention is also paid to the decision-theoretic principle known as the thesis of no subjective probability for self-action. Conditions in cope with this principle are given which underlie the interrelationships between different models of beliefs, and it is shown that under these conditions different doxastic structures can be coherently unified.
منابع مشابه
Decision Analysis with Indeterminate or Incoherent Probabilities*
This paper presents a new method of modeling indeterminate and incoherent probability judgments in decision analysis problems. The decision maker's degree of beliefs in the occurrence of an event is represented by a unimodal (in fact, concave) function on the unit interval, whose parameters are elicited in terms of lowcr and upper probabilities with attached confidence weights. This is shown to...
متن کاملA Note on Belief Structures and S-approximation Spaces
We study relations between evidence theory and S-approximation spaces. Both theories have their roots in the analysis of Dempsterchr('39')s multivalued mappings and lower and upper probabilities, and have close relations to rough sets. We show that an S-approximation space, satisfying a monotonicity condition, can induce a natural belief structure which is a fundamental block in evidence theory...
متن کاملRobust Opponent Modeling in Real-Time Strategy Games using Bayesian Networks
Opponent modeling is a key challenge in Real-Time Strategy (RTS) games as the environment is adversarial in these games, and the player cannot predict the future actions of her opponent. Additionally, the environment is partially observable due to the fog of war. In this paper, we propose an opponent model which is robust to the observation noise existing due to the fog of war. In order to cope...
متن کاملArbitrage, rationality, and equilibrium
No-arbitrage is the fundamental principle of economic rationality which unifies normative decision theory, game theory, and market theory. In economic environments where money is available as a medium of measurement and exchange, no-arbitrage is synonymous with subjective expected utility maximization in personal decisions, competitive equilibria in capital markets and exchange economies, and c...
متن کاملRationality and indeterminate probabilities
Introduction What is your degree of belief that the Democrats will win the next presidential election in the USA? If you report a sharp number, we will question you further. For example, if you report a credence of 0.6, we will ask whether you really mean 0.6000..., sharp to infinitely many decimal places. If you are anything like us, your credence is sharp only up to one or two decimal places....
متن کاملذخیره در منابع من
با ذخیره ی این منبع در منابع من، دسترسی به آن را برای استفاده های بعدی آسان تر کنید
عنوان ژورنال:
- CoRR
دوره abs/1309.1700 شماره
صفحات -
تاریخ انتشار 2013